Collection Tank an Integral Part of Treatment but Ignored

Role of Collection / Equalization Tank Operating Conditions in Enhancing STP’s Performance
Why the Collection / Equalization Tank Matters in a Conventional STP?

In a conventional sewage treatment plant (STP) based on the Activated Sludge Process (ASP), the collection tank / equalization tank is often viewed only as a hydraulic buffer. However, the biological condition maintained in this tank has a direct influence on the efficiency, stability, and nutrient removal capability of the downstream aerobic treatment system.

When operated under controlled anaerobic conditions, the collection / equalization tank can significantly improve the overall performance of the activated sludge process by preserving the influent’s biological treatment potential.

Role of the Collection / Equalization Tank in an ASP-Based STP

For the activated sludge process to function effectively, the influent wastewater must retain:

  • Adequate biodegradable organic carbon


  • A favourable COD : N balance


  • A favourable COD : N balance

The collection / equalization tank acts as the first biological conditioning zone. Its operation determines whether the wastewater entering the aeration tank is biologically enriched or biologically depleted.

Benefits of Anaerobic Conditions in the Collection / Equalization Tank

When the collection / equalization tank is maintained without aeration and with only limited mixing:

  • Dissolved oxygen is quickly depleted


  • Organic matter is not aerobically oxidised


  • Carbon remains preserved for downstream biological processes


  • Partial fermentation may begin without full degradation

This ensures that the influent reaching the aeration tank still contains readily utilizable carbon, which is essential for:

  • Stable heterotrophic biomass growth


  • Effective denitrification in anoxic zones

Adverse Effects of Aeration in Collection / Equalization Tanks

In many STPs, the collection / equalization tank is aerated to prevent odour or avoid septicity. While well intentioned, this practice can adversely affect the activated sludge process.

Consequences of Aerating the Collection / Equalization Tank

  • Readily biodegradable COD is consumed prematurely


  • Organic carbon is oxidised to CO₂


  • Influent entering the aeration tank becomes carbon-limited


  • Biological nutrient removal efficiency is reduced

Aerating the collection / equalization tank effectively diverts carbon away from the aeration tank, where it is most needed.

Impact on Activated Sludge Process Performance

When carbon-deficient wastewater enters the aeration tank:

  • Denitrification efficiency in anoxic zones decreases

  • Nitrogen removal becomes inconsistent

  • Aeration energy demand increases

  • External carbon dosing may become necessary

  • Overall process resilience reduces

This results in higher operating costs and greater operator intervention.`

Anaerobic vs Aerated Collection / Equalization Tank
Comparison for ASP-Based STPs
Paramater

Dissolved oxygen

Carbon preservation

Readily biodegradable COD

Suitability for denitrification

Need for external carbon

Impact on aeration tank

Energy consumption

Anaerobic Collection / Equalization Tank

~0 mg/L

High

Retained

High

Reduced

Positive

Low

Aerated Collection / Equalization Tank

1–3 mg/L

Low

Oxidised

Poor

Often required

Carbon-limited

Higher

Parameter

Dissolved oxygen

Carbon preservation

Readily biodegradable COD

Suitability for denitrification

Need for external carbon

Impact on aeration tank

Energy consumption

Anaerobic Collection / Equalization Tank

~0 mg/L

High

Retained

High

Reduced

Positive

Low

Aerated Collection / Equalization Tank

1–3 mg/L

Low

Oxidised

Poor

Often required

Carbon-limited

Higher

Parameter

Dissolved oxygen

Carbon preservation

Readily biodegradable COD

Suitability for denitrification

Need for external carbon

Impact on aeration tank

Energy consumption

Anaerobic Collection / Equalization Tank

~0 mg/L

High

Retained

High

Reduced

Positive

Low

Aerated Collection / Equalization Tank

1–3 mg/L

Low

Oxidised

Poor

Often required

Carbon-limited

Higher

Anaerobic Conditioning vs Septic Treatment

It is important to distinguish controlled anaerobic conditions in a collection / equalization tank from septic treatment, as the two differ significantly in both intent and outcome.

Controlled Anaerobic Conditioning (Preferred for ASP)

This represents short-term anaerobic retention, intended only for biological conditioning.

Key characteristics:
  • Short hydraulic retention time (hours)

  • No sludge digestion or stabilisation

  • No methane generation

  • Limited to acidogenic activity

  • Wastewater remains biologically active

Benefit to ASP:
  • Preserves organic carbon

  • Enhances denitrification potential

  • Improves biological stability in aeration tanks

Septic Conditions (Undesirable for STP)

Septic tanks are designed for long-term anaerobic digestion, not conditioning.

Key characteristics:
  • Long retention time (days)

  • Sludge accumulation and digestion

  • Methane and Sulphide Generation

  • Loss of biodegradable carbon

  • Production of reduced, inhibitory compounds

Impact on STP:
  • Reduced oxygen transfer efficiency

  • Inhibition of nitrifying organisms

  • Odour and Corrosion Problems

  • Poor Sludge Settleability

  • Longer recovery times after shock loads

Septic effluent is biologically exhausted, not biologically prepared, for aerobic treatment.

Design Philosophy for Conventional STPs

For STPs employing the activated sludge process, the collection/equalisation tank should be designed and operated as a carbon management and conditioning zone, not as a treatment reactor.

  • Avoid aeration unless absolutely necessary

  • Limit mixing to hydraulic requirements

  • Control retention time

  • Prevent sludge accumulation

This approach ensures that wastewater entering the aeration tank retains maximum biological value, leading to improved treatment efficiency, regulatory compliance, and long-term operational reliability.