Comparison of: EcoSBR vs. MBR
Choosing a sewage treatment plant should be a data-driven process, and a comparison of two leading advanced wastewater treatment technologies is being presented so that an informed decision can be made by a customer. A critical balance of performance, cost, and operational reality is critical in choosing the right suitable option.
Cross Process Methadology
Cost and Energy Comparison
> Cost of Ownership Comparison
MBR's higher capital costs for membranes and significant operational costs for energy and maintenance create a stark contrast with EcoSBR's more economical profile.
> Energy Consumption
MBR requires 2-3x more air for biological treatment and constant membrane scouring, resulting in significantly higher energy use.
Operations
A major differentiator: EcoSBR's automation minimizes human intervention, while MBR demands constant, skilled oversight.
EcoSBR Low / Fully Automated
MBR High / Extremely Demanding
MBR's primary challenge is membrane fouling, requiring intensive chemical cleaning and eventual replacement.
EcoSBR's batch process inherently handles fluctuating loads better than MBR's continuous flow, which is less adaptable to low-flow or shock-load events.
While both systems produce high-quality treated water, MBR's physical membrane barrier provides a superior level of purification, often eliminating the need for tertiary treatment.