View More

Anoxic chamber after Aeration
“A Big No”

Placing an anoxic chamber after the main aeration chamber is indeed not the optimal or most effective way to achieve denitrification in most activated sludge configurations. In fact, it's often considered the "wrong" way to design for robust denitrification.

Let's break down why, focusing on the conditions required for effective denitrification:

Understanding Denitrification Requirements

Denitrification is the biological process where specialized facultative anaerobic bacteria (denitrifiers) convert nitrate (NO3−​) into nitrogen gas (N2​), which then harmlessly escapes into the atmosphere. For this process to occur efficiently, three key conditions must be met:

  1. Anoxic Conditions: This means the complete absence of dissolved oxygen (DO), but the presence of nitrates. Denitrifiers prefer to use nitrates as an electron acceptor over oxygen because it's more energy-efficient for them in the absence of free oxygen.

  1. Readily Biodegradable Organic Carbon (Electron Donor): Denitrifying bacteria need a source of organic carbon (BOD/COD) as "food" or an electron donor to fuel the conversion of nitrate to nitrogen gas.

  1. Presence of Nitrates: There must be nitrates available in the mixed liquor, which are typically produced in an upstream aerobic (nitrification) zone.

Why an Anoxic Chamber After Aeration is Suboptimal for Denitrification

When an anoxic chamber is placed after the main aeration chamber, it faces significant challenges in meeting the requirements for efficient denitrification:

1. Lack of Readily Biodegradable Carbon:

  • The Major Problem: In the main aeration chamber, the primary goal is to oxidize organic carbon (BOD/COD) using oxygen. By the time the mixed liquor leaves the main aeration chamber, most of the readily biodegradable organic carbon in the influent wastewater has already been consumed by the aerobic heterotrophic bacteria.

  • "Famine" Conditions: The anoxic chamber downstream therefore receives "hungry" bacteria in a "famine" state, with very little easily available carbon to drive denitrification.

  • Consequence: Denitrification will be slow, incomplete, or require an external carbon source (like methanol, acetate, or molasses). Adding an external carbon source significantly increases operational costs and complexity, making the design economically unattractive.

2. Maintaining Anoxic Conditions is Challenging:

  • High DO Carryover: The mixed liquor exiting the main aeration chamber will have a high dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration (typically 1.5-3.0 mg/L).

  • Oxygen Scavenging: When this high-DO mixed liquor enters the anoxic chamber, the first metabolic activity that will occur is oxygen consumption by heterotrophic bacteria (respiration). Only once the DO is completely depleted can denitrification begin. This process consumes some of the remaining limited carbon and takes time.

  • Inefficient DO Removal: If the anoxic chamber is not adequately sized or mixed (without aeration, but sufficient mixing to keep solids in suspension), achieving truly anoxic conditions rapidly can be difficult.

3. Reduced Denitrification Potential:

  • Because of the lack of carbon and the presence of residual DO, the overall denitrification efficiency in this configuration will be significantly lower than in optimally designed systems.

  • The plant might struggle to meet stringent total nitrogen (TN) discharge limits, common for effluent reuse or discharge to sensitive water bodies in regions like Tamil Nadu.

The Correct Way to Achieve Denitrification: Upstream or Internal Anoxic Zones

For effective and economical denitrification, the anoxic zone is typically placed upstream of the main aerobic zone or integrated as internal anoxic zones with recirculation.

1. Pre - Anoxic (Anaerobic - Anoxic - Aerobic or A2O - type configurations):

  • Flow Path: Influent wastewater → Anaerobic (for P removal) → Anoxic → Aerobic → Clarifier.

  • Recirculation: Mixed liquor from the aerobic zone (containing nitrates) is internally recycled back to the upstream anoxic zone.

  • Why it Works:

  • Readily Available Carbon: The anoxic zone receives the raw or partially pre-treated influent wastewater, which is rich in readily biodegradable organic carbon. This carbon serves as the perfect "food" for denitrifiers.

  • Nitrate Source: Nitrates are continuously supplied from the downstream aerobic zone via internal recirculation, completing the cycle.

  • Optimal Conditions: This design provides the ideal conditions (anoxic environment, carbon, nitrates) for efficient denitrification without the need for external carbon addition.

2. Intermittent Aeration (as in SBRs):

  • Flow Path: Single tank operating in cycles (Fill → Anoxic Mix → Aerobic Mix → Settle → Decant).

  • Why it Works: The aeration is turned off for a period during the "react" phase. During this anoxic period, nitrates (formed during previous aerobic phases) are consumed using the remaining organic carbon in the mixed liquor. When aeration is turned back on, more nitrates are formed, ready for the next anoxic phase. This internal cycling achieves efficient BNR.

3. High Biomass Concentration and Activity:

Due to their high density and excellent settling properties, AGS systems can maintain significantly higher MLSS concentrations (often double or triple that of conventional activated sludge) in the reactor.

This high biomass concentration, combined with the efficient mass transfer within the granules, leads to high volumetric loading rates and superior treatment performance (e.g., robust COD, BOD, nitrogen, and phosphorus removal).

4. Superior Settling Velocity:

Aerobic granules have settling velocities that are typically 3 to 10 times higher than those of conventional activated sludge flocs.


This allows for:

  • Rapid and complete phase separation in the SBR.

  • Minimization of the "sludge volume" (low SVI) as the granules quickly form a compact bed at the bottom of the reactor.

  • Reduced footprint requirements for the treatment plant, as smaller reactors can handle higher loads.

5. Robustness and Stability:

The compact granular structure makes AGS more resistant to hydraulic shocks, toxic loads, and shear forces compared to fragile flocs.

The dense nature of the granules prevents them from being easily washed out of the system, contributing to more stable operation at high biomass concentrations.

Conclusion:

Placing an anoxic chamber after the main aeration chamber is generally ineffective and inefficient for biological denitrification. The primary reasons are the depletion of readily biodegradable organic carbon in the preceding aerobic zone and the challenge of overcoming the high dissolved oxygen carryover. Effective denitrification strategies rely on providing anoxic conditions in the presence of raw or partially consumed organic carbon and a consistent supply of nitrates, which is best achieved through upstream anoxic zones with internal recirculation or through intermittent aeration in batch reactors like SBRs. This ensures optimal nitrogen removal, cost efficiency, and compliance with stringent discharge standards.